Swan International Statement and Petition – Open Borders Now!

 

THE PETITION CAN BE FOUND ONLINE HERE: www.change.org/p/eu-parliament-european-council-social-workers-across-europe-demand-openeuborders-for-refugees-and-asylum-seekers?recruiter=7525925&utm_source=share_for_starters&utm_medium=copyLink

Statement

We are witnessing an almost unprecedented movement of people in the world due to political conflict. Based on the IOM and UNHCR data, an estimated 590,000 people entered the EU by the sea in the first 9.5 months of 2015. IOM’s research also indicates that Europe is the most dangerous destination for “irregular” migrants, with the Mediterranean costing the lives of over 3,000 people in 2015 to date. The EU and individual governments need to respond to their plight in line with the basic principles and standards set forth in the relevant human rights instruments and frameworks of the United Nations, which hasn’t been the case to date.

1. There is a need to create safe and legal routes to the EU. Permitting travel by ordinary means will do much to halt the hazardous boat traffic and will save lives. Such routes ought to include:

– Humanitarian visas (for the specific purpose of seeking asylum on arrival)

– Resettlement schemes, accepting refugees directly from the country of persecution.

– Humane family reunion policies

– EU funding for the Refugee Air initiative.

– Either suspend or abolish EU Directive 2001/51/EC, which in reality prevents refugees from accessing commercial travel options and delegates refugee assessment/checking to the commercial carriers.

2. Safe and legal routes within the EU through full suspension of The Dublin III regulation (No. 604/2013).

3. Decriminalisation of citizen support for refugees, including transport.

4. Abolishment of detention camps and support for safe use of community volunteering initiatives on temporary basis. Detention camps and temporary camps provide inhuman and degrading conditions for people fleeing persecution and political conflict, subjecting them to further abuse and neglect. Many communities wish to provide temporary or more permanent housing support. Thanks to social networking sites and use of internet in general, social workers in particular can be supported to co-ordinate such community housing schemes.

Open EU borders now! 

 

Οι Κοινωνικοί Λειτουργοί σε όλη την Ευρώπη απαιτούμε- #OpenEUborders

Ανοίξτε τα Ευρωπαϊκά Σύνορα για τους πρόσφυγες και τους αιτούντες άσυλο

Βιώνουμε μια σχεδόν άνευ προηγούμενου μετακίνηση ανθρώπων στο κόσμο εξαιτίας πολιτικών αναταραχών. Σύμφωνα με τον Διεθνή Οργανισμό Μετανάστευσης (IOM) και τον Οργανισμό Ηνωμένων Εθνών για τους Πρόσφυγες (UNHCR), περίπου 590.000 άνθρωποι εισήλθαν στην Ευρώπη μέσω της θάλασσας τους πρώτους 9,5 μήνες του 2015. Επίσης, η έρευνα του ΙΟΜ αναδεικνύει την Ευρώπη ως τον πιο επικίνδυνο προορισμό για τους ‘παράτυπους’ μετανάστες, καθώς πάνω από 3.000 ζωές ανθρώπων έχουν χαθεί στη Μεσόγειο μέσα στο 2015. Οι κυβερνήσεις των Ευρωπαϊκών κρατών πρέπει να ανταποκριθούν στη σοβαρότητα της κατάστασης σύμφωνα με τις βασικές αρχές και τα πρότυπα που ορίζονται από τη σύμβαση για τα ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα των Ηνωμένων Εθνών και παρόμοιες διατάξεις, γεγονός που δεν έχει συμβεί μέχρι σήμερα.

1. Είναι αναγκαίο να δημιουργηθούν ασφαλή και νόμιμες οδοί διέλευσης στην Ευρώπη. Η εξασφάλιση της πρόσβασης με κανονικά μέσα μεταφοράς θα είναι σωτήρια για χιλιάδες ζωές που διακινδυνεύουν τη ζωή τους χρησιμοποιώντας βάρκες. Οι συγκεκριμένες οδοί διέλευσης χρειάζεται να εξασφαλίζουν τα ακόλουθα: -Χορήγηση ανθρωπιστικής βίζας (για την αίτηση ασύλου κατά την άφιξη) -Προγράμματα επανεγκατάστασης που αποδέχονται άμεσα τους πρόσφυγες από τη χώρα δίωξης -Πολιτικές επανένωσης οικογενειών -Ευρωπαϊκή χρηματοδότηση για την πρωτοβουλία Refugee Air -Αναστολή ή κατάργηση της Ευρωπαϊκής Οδηγίας 2001/51/EC, η οποία στην πραγματικότητα εμποδίζει τους πρόσφυγες από τη δυνατότητα να ταξιδέψουν με επίσημα μέσα.

2. Ασφαλή και νόμιμες οδοί διέλευσης στην Ευρώπη μέσω της πλήρους αναστολής της οδηγίας Δουβλίνο ΙΙΙ (Dublin III, No. 604/2013)

3. Αποποινικοποίηση της υποστήριξης των πολιτών στους πρόσφυγες, συμπεριλαμβανομένης της μεταφοράς/μετακίνησης

4. Κατάργηση των κέντρων κράτησης και υποστήριξη της ασφαλούς χρήσης των πρωτοβουλιών εθελοντισμού στις κοινότητες σε προσωρινή βάση. Οι συνθήκες στα κέντρα κράτησης καθώς και στους προσωρινούς καταυλισμούς είναι απάνθρωπες, εξευτελιστικές, και υποβάλουν σε περαιτέρω κακοποίηση και παραμέληση ανθρώπους που δραπετεύουν από διωκτικά καθεστώτα και πολιτικές αναταραχές. Πολλές κοινότητες επιθυμούν να παρέχουν προσωρινή ή μόνιμη κατοικία στους πρόσφυγες. Χάρη στα μέσα κοινωνικής δικτύωσης και της χρήσης του διαδικτύου γενικότερα, οι κοινωνικοί λειτουργοί, ειδικά, μπορούν να υποστηριχθούν στο να συντονίσουν τέτοιες πρωτοβουλίες κοινοτικής στέγασης.

Ανοίξτε τα σύνορα της Ευρώπης τώρα!  

 

Decleration:

Nous assistons à un mouvement migratoire presque sans précédent de personnes dans le monde en raison d’un conflit politique. D’après les données de l’OIM et du UNHCR, environ 590.000 personnes sont entrées dans l’Union Européenne par la mer lors des 9 premiers mois et demi de l’année 2015. L’OIM indique également que l’Europe est la destination la plus dangereuse pour les migrants «en situation irrégulière». Sachant qu’en 2015 et à ce jour, 3 000 personnes ont perdu la vie en tentant de traverser la Méditerranée, l’Union Européenne et chacun de ses États individuellement se doivent de répondre à leur cris de détresse suivant les principes de base et les normes tels qu’énoncés dans la Déclaration de Droits de l’Homme et dans le cadre des Nations Unies – ce qui n’a pas été le cas jusqu’à présent.

 

  1. Il est urgent de créer des itinéraires sécurisés et autorisés pour accéder à l’Union Européenne. La mise en place de modes de voyage et de transports habituels et légaux permettra de mettre fin à la circulation de bateaux dangereux et de sauver des vies.

Ce qui doit inclure:

– L’octroi de visas humanitaires (dans le but précis de demander l’asile à l’arrivée)

– Des programmes d’installation, et de prise en charge, directement depuis le pays de persécution, des réfugiés.

– Des mesures de regroupement familial humaines.

– Le financement par l’Union Européenne de l’opération « Air Réfugiés ».

– La suspension ou la suppression de la directive européenne 2001/51 / CE qui, en réalité, empêche les réfugiés d’accéder à des options commerciales de voyage, et qui oblige les sociétés commerciales privées à évaluer et vérifier le statut des réfugiés.

 

  1. La mise en place dans l’Union Européenne d’un itinéraire sûr et légal, par le biais de la suspension complète du règlement de Dublin III (n ° 604/2013).

 

  1. La dépénalisation de l’assistance des citoyens aux réfugiés, y compris leur transport.

 

4. Suppression de camps de détention et de soutien au profit de l’utilisation en tout sécurité d’initiatives communautaires bénévoles temporaires. Les camps de détention et les camps temporaires offrent des conditions inhumaines et dégradantes pour les personnes qui fuient la persécution et les conflits politiques, en les soumettant à d’autres mauvais traitements et négligences. Beaucoup de communautés souhaitent apporter une aide au logement temporaire ou plus permanente. Grâce aux réseaux sociaux et à l’utilisation d’internet en général, les travailleurs sociaux principalement peuvent prendre en charge et coordonner ces programmes de logement communautaires.  

Ouvrez les frontières de l’UE maintenant!

Trabajadores sociales de toda Europa demandan: – #OpenEUborders, fronteras abiertas para los refugiados y solicitantes de asilo

Estamos siendo testigos de un desplazamiento de personas a consecuencia de un conflicto político casi sin precedentes en el mundo. A partir de los datos de la Organización Internacional para las Migraciones (OIM) y la ACNUR, se estima que 590.000 personas entraron por mar en la UE durante los primeros nueve meses y medio de este año 2015. La investigación realizada por la OIM también indica que Europa es el destino más peligroso para los inmigrantes „irregulares“, con el cruce del mediterráneo habiendo costado 3000 vidas humanas en lo que llevamos de 2015. La UE y los gobiernos de los estados miembros individualmente tienen que responder a esta situación en concordancia con los principios y normas básicas establecidas en los marcos legales de las Naciones Unidas así como en los instrumentos legales pertinentes de protección de los derechos humanos, lo cual, hasta el momento, no ha sido el caso.

 

  1. Es necesario crear rutas seguras y legales hacia la UE. Permitir que el viaje se realice mediante medios de transporte ordinarios sería una gran contribución para detener el tan arriesgado transito en botes, y, consecuentemente, salvar vidas. Tales rutas deben incluir:
  • Visados humanitarios (para el propósito especifico de la solicitud de asilo a la llegada)
  • Procedimientos de realojo, aceptando a los refugiados directamente desde el país de persecución.
  • Políticas humanas de reunificación familiar.
  • Financiación por parte de la UE de la iniciativa „Refugee Air“.
  • La suspensión o derogación de la directiva europea 2001/51/EC, que en realidad impide a los refugiados el acceso a los medios de transporte comerciales y delega la evaluación/legitimación de los refugiados a las compañías de transporte.

 

  1. Rutas seguras y legales dentro de la UE con la suspensión total del reglamento Dublín III (Reglamento UE nº 604/2013).

 

  1. Despenalización del apoyo ciudadano a los refugiados, incluido el transporte.

 

  1. Abolición de los campos de detención y apoyo para el uso seguro de las iniciativas comunitarias voluntarias de acogida temporal. Las personas que huyen de la persecución y el conflicto político encuentran condiciones de vida inhumanas y degradantes en los campos de detención, campos de refugiados y centros de estancia temporal, siendo expuestos a abusos y negligencias. Muchas comunidades desean facilitar soluciones y apoyo para el alojamiento temporal e incluso más permanente de los refugiados. Gracias a las redes sociales y al uso generalizado de internet, los trabajadores sociales en particular pueden recibir apoyos para coordinar soluciones de acogida comunitaria.

 

Fronteras de la UE abiertas ya!

 

Sozialarbeiter_innen aus ganz Europa fordern: Offene EU Grenzen für Flüchtlinge und Asylbewerber_innen

Aufgrund von politischen Konflikten erleben wir auf der Erde eine fast beispiellose Bewegung von Menschen.

Bis Mitte Oktober 2015 sind nach Angaben der IOM und dem UNHCR ca. 590.000 Menschen über den Seeweg nach Europa geflohen. Forschungsergebnisse der IOM weisen darauf hin, dass Europa das gefährlichste Ziel für „irreguläre“ Migrant_innen ist, allein die Flucht über das Mittelmeer kostete in diesem Jahr bislang über 3000 Menschenleben.

Die EU und die einzelnen Regierungen müssen auf diesen Notstand reagieren.

Auf Basis der Prinzipien und Standards die in den relevanten Menschenrechtsabkommen und Rahmenverträgen der Vereinten Nationen verankert sind, die bislang keine Beachtung fanden.

 

  1. Es besteht die Notwendigkeit für sichere und legale Fluchtwege nach Europa.

Die Reisefreiheit zu ermöglichen wird die Folge haben die riskanten Schiffsüberfahrten zu verhindern und wird Leben retten.

Legale Fluchtwege sollten beinhalten:

  • Die Vergabe von humanitären Visa (mit dem Zweck bei Ankunft einen Asylantrag stellen zu können)
  • Die Etablierung von Weiterwanderungsprogramme (Resettlement), die das Aufnehmen von Flüchtlingen direkt aus den Ländern der Verfolgung ermöglicht.
  • Die Einführung humaner Familienzusammenführungsregelungen
  • Die Finanzierung „Refugee Air Initiative“ durch die EU
  • Die Einstellung oder das Verbot der EU Directive 2001/51/EC, welche verhindert, dass Flüchtlinge kommerzielle Reiseoptionen nutzen können und welche die Prüfung, ob eine Person die Flüchtlingseigenschaft besitzt den Fluggesellschaften überträgt

 

  1. Sichere und legale Einwanderungswege in die EU sind zudem zu schaffen durch die völlige Aufhebung der Dublin III Regelung (No. 604/2013)

 

  1. Die Entkriminalisierung von Flüchtlingshilfe durch Privatpersonen und Initiativen inklusive des Transports ist notwendig

 

  1. Das Verbot von Haftlagern ist notwendig, ebenso wie die Unterstützung der vorübergehenden sicheren Nutzung von Angeboten von Freiwilligeninitiativen. Haftlager und Übergangslager sind inhuman und verschlechtern die Lebenssituation der Menschen die vor Verfolgung und politische Konflikte fliehen. Flüchtlinge werden in ihnen weiterer Vernachlässigung und Misshandlung unterworfen. Viele Initiativen möchten übergangsweise oder dauerhaft die Wohnsituation von Flüchtlingen unterstützen. Dank der sozialen Medien und des Internets im Allgemeinen können Sozialarbeiter_innen im Besonderen unterstützt werden, solche Wohnvorhaben zu realisieren.

 

Für die Öffnung der EU-Grenzen, jetzt!

 

Socijalne radnice i radnici širom Europe zahtijevaju otvaranje EU granica za izbjeglice i tražitelje azila #OpenEUborders

Uslijed ratnih sukoba, dnevno svjedočimo do sad neviđenom pokretu ljudi širom svijeta. Prema podacima IOM-a I UNHCR, govoto 590,000 ljudi je ušlo u EU putem mora u prvih 9.5 mjeseci 2015. godine. Istraživanje IOM-a ukazuje i da je Europa jedna od najopasnijih destinacija za «migrante». Do sad je tokom 2015. godine više od 3,000 ljudi poginulo tokom pokušaja da dođu do Europe prijelazom morske granice na Mediteranu. EU i vlade pojedinačnih zemalja članica trebaju odgovoriti potrebama izbjeglica i tražitelja azila u skladu sa osnovnim principima i standardima iskazanim u bitnim instrumentima i okvirima Ujedinjenih Naroda za ljudska prava – što nije bio slučaj do sada.

 

  1. Neophodno je osigurati sigurne i legalne metode putovanja i ulaska u EU. Davanje dozvole za uobičajene metode putovanja omogućit će nesigurna i ilegalna putovanja brodom i sačuvati ljudske živote. Moguće metode uključuju:
    • Humanitarne vize (čija bi isključiva namjena bila traženje azila u zemlji dolaska),
    • Program humanog preseljenja, koji bi omogučio davanje azila već u zemlji njihovog domicila.
    • Humane politike reunifikacije obitelji
    • Omogućavanje EU finansiranja za avio program za izbjeglice, ‘Refugee Air’
    • Suspenziju ili ukidanje EU Direktive 2001/51/EC, koja onemogućava izbjeglicama korištenje komercijalnih letova prema Europskim destinacijama.
  2. Osiguravanje sigurnih i legalnih mogućnosti putovanja unutar EU, kroz potpunu suspenziju Regulative Dublin III (No. 604/2013).

 

  1. Dekriminalizaciju građanske podrške izbjeglicama, uključujući i pružanje besplatnog transporta za izbjeglice.

 

  1. Ukidanje kampova za prijem i obradu izbjeglica, te podrška za sigurnu i provjerenu upotrebu privremenih mogućnosti smještaja kod volontera u zajednici. Izbjeglički kampovi za prijem i obradu izbjeglica širom Europe često dovode do nehumanog i ponižavajućeg tretmana ljudi koji bježe od progona i političkog konflikta u zemlji njihovog domicila. Time ih se izlaže ponovnom i ustrajnom zlostavljanju i zanemarivanju. Mnoge zajednice širom Europe žele pružiti mogućnosti privremenog ili stalnijeg smještaja za izbjeglice. Zahvaljujući socijalnim mrežama i upotrebi interneta, socijalne radnice i radnici bi trebali biti podržani i ovlašteni da koordiniraju takve mogućnosti smještaja.

 

Szociális munkások Európa-szerte követelik a határok megnyitását a menekültek és menedékkérők előtt – #OpenEUborders

 

Világszerte az emberek példátlan mozgásának lehetünk szemtanúi a világban, melynek okai politikai konfliktusok. Az IOM és az UNHCR adatai alapján közel 590 000 lépett be az EU-ba a tengeren 2015 első 9 és fél hónapjában. Szintén az IOM kutatásai alapján Európa a legveszélyesebb úti cél a „szabálytalan” migránsok számára, idén már több, mint 3000 ember életét követelve a Földközi-tengeren. Az EU-nak és az egyes kormányoknak is reagálniuk kell a helyzetre összhangban azzal, amit az ENSZ vonatkozó emberi jogi eszközei és keretrendszerei alapvető elvként és normaként meghatároznak, és amely lépéseket eddig még nem tettek meg.

 

  1. Szükség van biztonságos és legális útvonalak létrehozására az EU felé. A hagyományos módon történő utazás engedélyezése nagyban visszafogná a veszélyes hajóforgalmat és életeket mentene meg. Az ilyen útvonalaknak tartalmazniuk kellene a következőket:
  • Humanitárius vízumok (a menedékjog kérelme érdekében érkezéskor)
  • Letelepedési programok, az üldöző országokból jött menekültek befogadása. Emberséges családegyesítő politikák
  • A Refugee Air kezdeményezés EU-finanszírozása
  • Az EU 2001/51/EK irányelv felfüggesztése vagy eltörlése, amely a valóságban megakadályozza, hogy a menekültek kereskedelmi utazási lehetőségekhez férjenek hozzá, a menekültek elbírálását és ellenőrzését pedig a kereskedelmi szállítókra bízza.

 

  1. Biztonságos és legális útvonalak az EU-n belül, a Dublin III rendelet teljes felfüggesztésével (No. 604/2013).

 

  1. A menekülteknek nyújtott civil segítség dekriminalizációja, beleértve a közlekedést is.

 

  1. A táborok eltörlése és a közösségi önkéntes kezdeményezések biztonságos használatának támogatása ideiglenes jelleggel. A zárt és ideiglenes táborok embertelen és megalázó körülményeket biztosítanak azoknak az embereknek, akik üldöztetés és politikai konfliktusok elől menekülnek, további bántalmazásnak és elhanyagolásnak kitéve őket. Sok közösség szeretne ideiglenes vagy állandó lakhatási támogatást biztosítani. A közösségi hálózatoknak és általában az internetnek hála a szociális munkások segíthetőek az ilyen közösségi lakhatási rendszerek koordinálásában.

 

Nyissák meg az EU határait most!

2015-11-07 

 

Manifesto 2004: The Foundations of Swan

It forms the foundation of Swan and demonstrates our overtly critical and political stance. Feel free to draw upon this document as a resource:

Social work and social justice: a manifesto for a new engaged practice

Colleagues from the UK have published a manifesto for social work practice that calls for a political position of professional social work against the background of political and social changes.

Social work and social justice: a manifesto for a new engaged practice

 

  1. Social Work Today

Social work in Britain today has lost direction. This is not new. Many have talked about social work being in crisis for over thirty years now. The starting point for this Manifesto, however, is that the ‘crisis of social work’ can no longer be tolerated. We need to find more effective ways of resisting the dominant trends within social work and map ways forward for a new engaged practice.

Many of us entered social work – and many still do – out of a commitment to social justice or, at the very least, to bring about positive change in people’s lives. Yet increasingly the scope for doing so is curtailed.

Instead, our work is shaped by managerialism, by the fragmentation of services, by financial restrictions and lack of resources, by increased bureaucracy and work-loads, by the domination of care-management approaches with their associated performance indicators and by the increased use of the private sector. While these trends have long been present in state social work, they now dominate the day-to-day work of front line social workers and shape the welfare services that are offered to clients. The effect has been to increase the distance between managers and front line workers on the one hand, and between workers and service users on the other. The main concern of too many social work managers today is the control of budgets rather than the welfare of service users, while worker-client relationships are increasingly characterised by control and supervision rather than care.

Unless the fundamental direction of social work changes, then neither a new social work degree nor new bodies such as the Social Care Councils will do anything to improve the current situation. These are no more than ‘technical fixes’ for deep-rooted problems. So attempts by individual local authorities to alleviate the staffing crisis by offering cash incentives – the so-called ‘golden hellos’ – simply move the problem around.

In the absence of an organised response to these trends, people understandably react in different individual ways. Some social workers may leave the profession, but for many this is not an option. Some workers have found ways within their workplaces to occupy spaces where they can practice a more rounded social work – in the voluntary sector, for example, or in more specialist projects – but this option is not available to most. Even in the voluntary sector the trends are increasingly mirroring the managerialist pattern of the statutory agencies.

And yet, the need for a social work committed to social justice and challenging poverty and discrimination is greater than ever. In our view, this remains a project that is worth defending. More than any other welfare state profession, social work seeks to understand the links between ‘public issues’ and ‘private troubles’ and seeks to address both. It is for this reason that many who hold power and influence in our society would be delighted to see a demoralised and defeated social work, a social work that is incapable of drawing attention to the miseries and difficulties which beset so many in our society. This alone makes social work worth fighting for.

The current degraded status of social work as a profession is inextricably related to the status and standing of those we work with. Social work clients are amongst some of the most vulnerable and impoverished in our society, and have benefited least from New Labour’s social welfare reforms. In fact, under New Labour we have witnessed not only greater levels of material inequality, but also an intensified demonisation of asylum seekers, young people and poor families, the very groups that social workers engage with. Too often today social workers are often doing little more than supervising the deterioration of people’s lives.

So in opposition to those who would be happy to see a defeated and silenced social work occupation, we are seeking a social work that has prevention at its heart and recognises the value of collective approaches. At the same time we also recognise that good casework has also suffered as a result of the trends referred to above. We are looking to a social work that can contribute to shaping a different kind of social policy agenda, based on our understanding of the struggles experienced by clients in addressing a range of emotional, social and material problems and the strengths they bring to these struggles.

 

  1. Resources of hope

Many social workers who despair about the ways in which social work has been changed can see no way out of the current situation. Given the mauling that social work (and social workers) have taken from politicians and the tabloid media over the past twenty five years, some despair or despondency is understandable, However, there is a real danger that this can blind us to the new resources of hope that have emerged in recent years and which may point the way towards a reinvigorated social work practice which plays a part in the demands for a more just and humane society.

Over the last two decades the growth of users movements (like the disability movement and the mental health users movement) have brought innovation and insight to our ways of seeing social and individual problems. These movements have developed many relevant and interesting approaches to dealing with service users needs – collective advocacy, for example, or (in the mental health field) the Hearing Voices groups or user-led approaches such the Clubhouse model. The fact that these models have come, not from professional social work but from service users themselves, emphasises that social work needs to engage with, and learn from, these movements in ways that will allow partnerships to form and new knowledge bases and curricula to develop.

In addition the last few years have witnessed the growth of dynamic and international global protest movements against capitalism and war. In the 1960s and 1970s social work was profoundly influenced by the ‘spirit of the sixties’: the Vietnam anti-war, the black, and the women’s movements. It was this that laid the basis of future anti-oppressive social work practice. Today we are seeing the rise of similar social movements. Within the anti-capitalist and anti-war movements we have ‘greater resources of hope’ than have been available to us for 30 years. These have been movements within which user groups and NGO’s have fruitfully engaged and within which questions of social justice are paramount. They have challenged the orthodoxy of neo-liberal globalisation and its devastating impact on the poor and dispossessed across the world, on the environment and on the human costs of the privatisation of services.

The anti-capitalist movement was born out of the protests against the World Trade Organisation’s Third Ministerial in Seattle in 1999 and has since spread across the globe. Over the last year it has merged with the movement against war and Imperialism. In February 2003 the spirit of anti-capitalist protest dramatically came to Britain when 2 million people demonstrated in London against the war on Iraq. The breadth and inclusiveness of this movement in conjunction with its energy and youthfulness, has revitalised many who had fallen into despair. It has also had an impact in rejuvenating the spirit of protest within the trade union movement.

But these movements are not just against war and capitalism they have also started to think of alternative futures. Over the last three years at various World and European Social Forums large numbers of people have come together to share ideas and discuss what another world might look like. These debates can help us think about the shape of a modern engaged social work based around such core ‘anti-capitalist’ values as democracy, solidarity, accountability, participation, justice, equality, liberty and diversity.

Thus we find ourselves at a crossroads. Down one road is managerialism and increased marketisation, and with it frustration and despondency for frontline workers; while down the other there is a possibility – and it is no more than that – for a renewed and regenerated social work that engages with the resources of hope available in the new collective movements for an alternative, and better, world.

An ethical career

The enduring crisis of social work in Britain has taught us many things. It has brought us to a state of affairs that nobody in their right mind could possibly view as acceptable. It has taught us that there can be no return to a past of professional arrogance and that progressive change must involve users and all front line workers. As agents of change senior managers have had their day. It has reminded us that budget dominated welfare systems are cruel and destructive of human well-being. The casualties are everywhere in the social work system amongst clients and users and social workers. These years of turmoil have highlighted that social work has to be defined not by its function for the state but by its value base. Above all it has been a stark lesson in the need for collective organisation, both to defend a vision of social work based on social justice and also to defend the working conditions that make that possible.

As we noted at the start of this Manifesto, in the past many people entered social work because it seemed to offer a way of earning a living that did not involve oppressing or exploiting people, but on the contrary could contribute, even in a small way, to social change. It was, in other words, an ethical career. That potential for social change has all but been squeezed out of social work by the drives towards marketisation and managerialism that have characterised the last decade and a half. Yet overwhelmingly it is still the case that people enter social work not to be care-managers or rationers of services or dispensers of community punishment but rather to make a positive contribution to the lives of poor and oppressed people. If it is the widening gap between promise and reality that breeds much of the current anger and frustration amongst social workers, it is also the awareness that social work could be much more than it is at present that leads many of us to hang on in there.

We note that the organisation People and Planet includes social work within its ‘Ethical Careers Service’. If that progressive promise is to be realised even in part, then we need to coalesce and organise around a shared vision of what a genuinely anti-oppressive social work might be like.

This Manifesto is a small contribution towards the process of developing that vision and that organisation.

Chris Jones, Professor of Social Work, University of Liverpool.
Iain Ferguson, Lecturer in Social Work, University of Stirling.
Michael Lavalette, Senior Lecturer in Social Policy, University of Liverpool.
Laura Penketh, Lecturer in Social Work, University of Manchester.

2004

The manifesto online: http://www.liv.ac.uk/sspsw/Social_Work_Manifesto.html or http://www.socmag.net/?p=177

Swan’s Terry Murphy speaks out about Frontline

 The social work education programme that claims to ‘fast track’ the “brightest and best” social work leaders of tomorrow through Children and Families qualifications has long been condemned by Swan as a crude attempt to privatise social work education and at best water down, at worst eradicate, the ethical and political dimensions of the social work profession. 

There is only a month left to listen to the exchange, found 35 minutes into the show!

BBC Tees – Frontline debate (after 35mins)

 

Refugees Welcome Joint Statement And Call For Action.

 

We look forward to seeing the call come to life through joint actions with our members and other colleagues. We hope it enables us to welcome more refugees to the UK, end the DFT and help scrap the Immigration Bill as a matter of urgency:

 

Social workers welcome refugees to the UK – joint statement and call for action by the Association of Professors of Social Work (APSW), British Association of Social Workers (BASW), Joint University Council Social Work Education Committee (JUC SWEC) and Social Work Action Network (SWAN)

We are witnessing an almost unprecedented movement of people in the world due to political conflict. Based on the IOM and UNHCR data, an estimated 590,000 people entered the EU by the sea in the first 9.5 months of 2015. The UK government needs to respond to their plight in line with the basic principles and standards set forth in the relevant human rights instruments and frameworks of the United Nations, which hasn’t been the case to date.

We join our colleagues from the legal community in their call for action to the UK government. As a matter of urgency:
1 The UK should take a fair and proportionate share of asylum seekers and refugees, both those already within the EU and those still outside it. The UK’s present offer to accept 20,000 most vulnerable Syrian refugees from outside the EU by 2020 is too low, too slow and too narrow, particularly if compared with responsibilities already placed on Middle Eastern countries such as Lebanon and Jordan. Creation of the overcrowded refugee camps in these countries will only prevent refugees from working and leading an ordinary life in the long-term. It will also do nothing to address or curb the death toll in the Mediterranean.
2 Safe and legal routes to the UK, as well as to the EU, need to be established for all refugees. Permitting travel by ordinary means will do much to halt the hazardous boat traffic and will save lives. Such routes ought to include:
i Humanitarian visas – that is to say visas for the specific purpose of seeking asylum on arrival – issued in the country of departure or intended embarkation.
ii Resettlement schemes, accepting refugees directly from the country of persecution or from neighbouring states.
iii Humane family reunion policies, such as allowing child refugees in the UK to be joined by adult family members.
3 Safe and legal routes within the EU, including the UK, should be established. For instance:
i A relocation scheme to take refugees from destitute conditions elsewhere in Europe;
ii Full suspension of The Dublin III Regulation (No. 604/2013).
4 There should be access to fair and thorough procedures to determine eligibility for international protection wherever it is sought.

As social workers, we also wish to urge the government, as a matter of urgency:
5 To ensure appropriate funding of the existing specialist support for refugees and asylum seekers and for co-ordination of volunteer community initiatives.

This should particularly apply to support for unaccompanied minors seeking asylum. In 2014, 23,160 unaccompanied minors applied for asylum in the EU. This number is only to rise in 2015; according to UNICEF, a total of 110,000 children sought asylum in Europe between January and July 2015, an average of over 18,000 children every month. All unaccompanied minors need to be ensured representation, placed with adult relatives or with a foster family, ensured attempts to trace their family members as quickly as possible, and all other measures that take due account of family unity, welfare and social development of the unaccompanied minor as well as his/her health and safety and opinion when assessing the best interest of the child.

6 Abandon plans to introduce the new Immigration Act. If passed into law, the Immigration Bill will curtail asylum support for those people refused asylum who have previously been supported under section 94 (5) and Section 4(2) of the 1999 Immigration and Asylum Act. This will mean people whose asylum claims and any appeals are refused and who have dependents that are minors will not be eligible to receive even the current minimum levels of support. This would clearly not be in the family’s or the child’s best interests and it impossible to see how these proposals will comply with the need to safeguard children

7 End the Detained Fast Track (DFT). Currently, many people arriving in the UK are detained from the minute they claim asylum in the UK. The entire asylum claim is processed while they are locked in a high security immigration detention centre. People whose claims are heard from detention are not dealt with fairly and the decision to detain them is unreasonable, disproportionate and violates their right to liberty. The High Court ruled in July 2014 that the operation of the Fast Track had been so unfair as to be unlawful. Mr Justice Ouseley accepted that there were flaws in the safeguards designed to prevent vulnerable people from being wrongly fast tracked and found that the lack of adequate early access to legal advice was the crucial failing that tipped the system into unlawfulness. Furthermore, in December 2014 the Court of Appeal found that detention of appellants under the ‘quick processing criteria’ was unlawful as it failed to satisfy the requirements of clarity and transparency. The Court of Appeal issued an order requiring that the Home Office assess each appellant on the Fast Track, and only detain those who are considered at risk of absconding. We wish to urge the government to consider all appellants on the Fast Track and from suitable, community-based, accommodation.

Oct 31st 2015

Community-led Housing Conference

Details:
Together Our Voices Matter
Saturday, 21 November 2015 from 12:00 to 15:30

Kilmore Recreation Centre, Kilmore, Coolock, Dublin 5.
Book tickets here:
https://www.eventbrite.ie/e/together-our-voices-matter-tickets-19215143010

The aims of the conference are to:

1) Bring our community together on an equal and open footing.

2) Connect local services and local people together in an effective and appropriate way.

3) Share how we have put those affected first and how this process has worked.

                           ***************** ================= *****************

Speakers will include:

Members of the Irish Housing Network , Those Affected by the Housing and Homelessness Crisis, Local Services.

Timeline:

12.00pm – Welcome and Introductions

12.10-1.10pm – Plenary “What are the Problems”?

1.10-1.30pm – Break

1.30-2.30pm – Workshop “Creating Safe Spaces for Community Solutions to the Housing and Homelessness Crisis”

2.30-3pm – Proposed Solutions and Actions

Community-led Housing Conference

Details:
Together Our Voices Matter
Saturday, 21 November 2015 from 12:00 to 15:30

Kilmore Recreation Centre, Kilmore, Coolock, Dublin 5.
Book tickets here:
https://www.eventbrite.ie/e/together-our-voices-matter-tickets-19215143010

The aims of the conference are to:

1) Bring our community together on an equal and open footing.

2) Connect local services and local people together in an effective and appropriate way.

3) Share how we have put those affected first and how this process has worked.

                           ***************** ================= *****************

Speakers will include:

Members of the Irish Housing Network , Those Affected by the Housing and Homelessness Crisis, Local Services.

Timeline:

12.00pm – Welcome and Introductions

12.10-1.10pm – Plenary “What are the Problems”?

1.10-1.30pm – Break

1.30-2.30pm – Workshop “Creating Safe Spaces for Community Solutions to the Housing and Homelessness Crisis”

2.30-3pm – Proposed Solutions and Actions

Voices From The Frontline: A practitioner’s perspective on PREVENT.

 

Exploring The Role Of Social Workers In Tackling Radicalisation

(Prevent is part of the government’s counter-terrorism strategy, CONTEST. The aim of the strategy is to stop people becoming terrorists or supporting terrorism).

Young people are often ‘searching’ for an identity, but also a meaning to life so that they can ‘fit in’. Young people want answers to questions, and when they cannot get appropriate answers with proper reasoning they move their attention elsewhere. Sometimes the groups that young people turn to for guidance are misguided themselves, which exacerbates the problem. When incorrect information is delivered to young people that convinces them that no other opinion matters, they accept it as being the truth. Problems continue to arise when young people move away from these groups, and when they begin the rehabilitation process afterwards, because they now carry a guilt that they have to live with.

Social workers have to take a sensitive approach when they complete an assessment for a troubled young person who has been identified as being radicalised. This involves understanding the young person’s motivations behind contemplating acts of terrorism. Equally, it is important to understand the ‘self’. The word ‘self’ has two meanings here, firstly, understanding how the young person sees themselves and secondly, how they perceive the world around them. By doing this, the practitioner is able where necessary to challenge the perceptions of the young person. However, it is key for the practitioner to be trained and to have the correct knowledge and skills to get the young person to critically reflect upon their actions, and to get the young person to understand the consequences of any wrong-doing. The key in all successful intervention is indeed communication.

Policy developments such as CONTEST are perhaps a positive step in the right direction, but obviously not enough to deter young people from contemplating acts of terrorism. The government needs to stop putting up barriers and labelling young people as ‘terrorists’, this is not helping at all. Getting social workers to take the lead and to some degree police young people is not the answer. This is creating a “them and us” situation, which makes it difficult for both the practitioner and young person to challenge power differences. The government’s CONTEST strategy is failing: there are unanswered questions particularly about risk, thresholds and when practitioners should intervene.

There is a fine line between appropriate work and invading someone’s space and privacy. Practitioners frequently come across some harrowing situations, which can challenge their own value base, and the solution here is for those working with vulnerable people to be fully equipped with the right knowledge, skills and for regular good supervision to take place. Gaining trust; relationship building; motivating and encouraging radicalised young people is uniquely difficult because challenging the value base that they have absorbed is not a simple task. It takes time and a great deal of energy, particularly when you have a high caseload of complex cases. The social worker has to have an understanding of culture, religion and be able to support the young person, whilst also dealing with the wider concerns of parental and wider family support, the groups that they associate with and safeguarding the young person’s best interests.

It is an easy option for the government to let social workers take on the work in some respects, because practitioners do work well with young people. However, the government has failed to focus enough on “community cohesion”; rather it has undermined the community it wants to reach and support. Revising the Prevent strategy doesn’t address the bigger problem!

There is no doubt that social work must be open and accepting of change in the types of work it is expected to take on. However, no-longer can social workers sit back silently and allow government policies to negatively impact upon their work with vulnerable people, and it is important that practitioners continue to raise their voice and critique policies where required. Perhaps through innovation and confidence we can get the government to understand that social work can and will answer back!

Each and every one of us has a responsibility to build a better future for all to live in peace. Together we will bring change and make a difference!

Imran A. Mohammed 

Mental Health Charter with Updated Signatories – A Resource for All

Since then, the Charter has provided the basis for much joint work with other interested parties and we encourage all those interested in campaigning on this issue to make use of it.

The Charter states that it “describes reasons for the current crisis and suggests what needs to be done to resist and build alternatives. It seeks to be a starting point for discussion and action rather than a definitive statement. SWAN invites those who support the broad perspective described here whether as an individual or on behalf of service user and community groups, campaigns, trade unions and services to endorse the Charter but also to develop further resources from it. More importantly we hope the Charter will be a useful campaigning tool for activists to help build alliances of resistance and to contribute to the development of more and better support for those with mental health needs.”

Please see the attachments below.

“Why Do You Sit By and Allow Me To Live Like This?” – The Story Behind the Pictures

 
 
 
“Stand Up to Racism organised a makeshift stage, and speakers from both the refugee community and solidarity groups took to the stage to express outrage at the situation in Calais.
 
 
The protest was mostly refugees, with groups from France, PCS from UK, Stand Up to Racism groups from Birmingham & London, trade union groups from Portsmouth, Leicester, Glasgow, Stop the War Coalition Scotland and our SWAN student group from Merseyside. 
 
 
The banner in this pic was from a French coalition solidarity group, CISPM, it says ‘freedom of movement and settlement for all.’ : 
 
 

We students were able to spend time with refugees individually and listen to their stories, we were able to express our solidarity and were well received- those we met were warm and welcoming. We walked into the camp a short way. Although the ingenuity of the communities and agencies on the ground means that there is a sense of organisation- with new, sturdier shelters going up, the conditions are horrendous. Tents surrounded by rubbish and mud. It was raining whilst we were there, I can’t imagine how much worse it will get as the seasons change.
 
 
I am stunned that this degree of inhumanity and indifference on behalf of our governments exists so nearby. 
 
 
I knew before we arrived that the majority of the refugee community in Calais are young men, trying to find a better situation in the hope that their families will join them afterwards. I was shocked then to meet the children who live in the jungle, one of my pics shows three children holding a banner. Two of them seem momentarily happy, despite the situation, but the little girl on the right just stared at me- I read so much more in her unsmiling face; I imagine her asking me, across our language barrier, why do you sit by and allow me to live like this?” 
 
 
Jemma.
 
(Please note: permission was sought for every photograph).

Official Statement – Help and Support for Refugees in the UK and Europe

Here, you will find that our intention is to continue highlighting the need for more humane and responsive social policies from the UK  government. As social workers expected to deliver such policies, we will lead the call for change. 

 

SWAN statement and a call for action – help and support for refugees in UK and in Europe

We are witnessing an almost unprecedented movement of people in the world due to political conflict. Based on the IOM and UNHCR data, an estimated 590,000 refugees (labeled as migrants) entered the EU by the sea in the first 9.5 months of 2015.[i] Due to the approaching winter months, there is an urgent need to respond to their plight appropriately, which hasn’t been the case to date.

We join our colleagues from the legal community in their call for action to the UK government[ii]. As a matter of urgency:

  • The UK should take a fair and proportionate share of refugees, both those already within the EU and those still outside it. The UK’s present offer to accept 20,000 most vulnerable Syrian refugees by 2020 is too low, too slow and too narrow.
  • Safe and legal routes to the UK, as well as to the EU, need to be established for all refugees. Permitting travel by ordinary means will do much to halt the hazardous boat traffic and will save lives. Such routes ought to include:
    • Humanitarian visas – that is to say visas for the specific purpose of seeking asylum on arrival – issued in the country of departure or intended embarkation.
    • Resettlement schemes, accepting refugees directly from the country of persecution or from neighbouring states.
    • Humane family reunion policies, such as allowing child refugees in the UK to be joined by adult family members.
  • Safe and legal routes within the EU, including the UK, should be established. For instance:
    • A relocation scheme to take refugees from destitute conditions elsewhere in Europe;
    • A suspension of the ‘Dublin’ system, save for the purpose of family reunification.
  • There should be access to fair and thorough procedures to determine eligibility for international protection wherever it is sought.

 

Additionally, the government should also ensure, as a matter of urgency:

  • Appropriate funding of specialist support for refugees and asylum seekers and for co-ordination of volunteer community initiatives.
    • This should particularly apply to support for unaccompanied minors seeking asylum. In 2014, 23,160 unaccompanied minors applied for asylum in the EU.[iii] This number is only to rise in 2015; according to UNICEF, a total of 110,000 children sought asylum in Europe between January and July 2015, an average of over 18,000 children every month.[iv] All unaccompanied minors need to be ensured representation, placed with adult relatives or with a foster family, ensured attempts to trace their family members as quickly as possible, and all other measures that take due account of family unity, welfare and social development of the unaccompanied minor as well as his/her health and safety and opinion when assessing the best interest of the child.

 

  • Abandon plans to introduce the new Immigration Act. If passed into law, the Immigration Bill will remove section 95 of the 1999 Immigration and Asylum Act. This will mean people whose asylum claims and any appeals are rejected and who have dependents that are minors will not be eligible to receive even the current minimum levels of support. Such plans create serious safeguarding issues or place additional burdens for local authorities to provide such families with support under section 17 duties under the 1989 Children Act – all while facing severe budget cuts due to austerity measures.

 

  • End the Detained Fast Track (DFT). Currently, many people arriving in the UK are detained from the minute they claim asylum in the UK. The entire asylum claim is processed while they are locked in a high security immigration detention centre. People whose claims are heard from detention are not dealt wit fairly and the decision to detain them is unreasonable, disproportionate and violates their right to liberty. The High Court ruled in July 2014 that the operation of the Fast Track had been so unfair as to be unlawful. Mr Justice Ouseley accepted that there were flaws in the safeguards designed to prevent vulnerable people from being wrongly fast tracked and found that the lack of adequate early access to legal advice was the crucial failing that tipped the system into unlawfulness. Furthermore, in December 2014 the Court of Appeal found that detention of appellants under the ‘quick processing criteria’ was unlawful as it failed to satisfy the requirements of clarity and transparency. The Court of Appeal issued an order requiring that the Home Office assess each appellant on the Fast Track, and only detain those who are considered at risk of absconding[v]. We wish to urge the government to consider all appellants on the Fast Track and from suitable, community-based, accommodation.

 

[i] http://www.iom.int/news/mediterranean-arrivals-near-record-600000 ; http://data.unhcr.org/mediterranean/regional.php

[ii] http://www.lawyersrefugeeinitiative.org

[iii] http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&pcode=tps00194&language=en

[iv] http://www.unicef.org/publicpartnerships/files/Refugee_and_migrant_children_in_Europe_-_Sept_2015.pdf

[v] Data via Detention Action, 2015 (www.detentionaction.org.uk)

Convoy Update – 4 Days to Go!!

We think there will be just over 50 people from SWAN groups travelling on the day. Groups are booked on a variety of boats and trains, but need to arrive at the jungle before 1pm local time.
 
Some general (though perhaps obvious) information: 
 
First, remember your passports!!
 
Second, make sure your vehicle is road worthy and meets French requirements!
 
Third, it will be a long day. Plan for breaks, share driving, take food and water. We will aim to be at the jungle no later than 1pm. After we have dropped material and handed over money we will make our way to the demonstration. The demo will be over by 18.30 French time. Some of you may have to leave before that. Plan to give yourself plenty of time to get through the checks and back on your train or boat.
 
Folkestone and Dover 
 
If you are taking the Eurostar, people are booked on a variety of trains. 
 
Dan will be our SWAN contact point here – although he is booked on the 09.50 train. He will be there early and will have contact with other groups. Dan’s number is 07989432570
 
The directions from the Sangat exit in France are:
 
From the tunnel, you head toward Calais and follow all the signs toward the port/ferry…. you look for exit 2 called ‘Z.I. des dunes/Oye-Plage’ which is an industrial estate. As you exit, you can see the jungle on your right. Park just beyond the bridge on the grassy area or any of the side roads before the camp. Lock your cars and walk over to the camp where we will meet up with stewards, people living there and French organisations. 

 
If you are travelling from Dover we are aiming for the 9.25 sailing with Brittany Ferries. Michael is our lead in Dover. His mobile is 07739729214.
 
Money
 
If you are taking money we suggest you pay it into the SWAN national account. We will then hand over cheques to the organisations we are liaising with: (a) Secours Catholique, (b) L’Auberge du Migrants and (c) Salam
 
If you are paying in money please do the following.
 
1. Send the money to Social Work Action Network, Coop Bank, sort code 089299, account number 653211151. Please mark payment ‘Calais refugee support’
 
2. Once you have done this please send a text to Michael (07739729214) confirming the amount paid in.  We will then pay the total sum to the organisations on Saturday.
 
Banners
 
Please take banners, flags etc with you. We want a good show from SWAN on the demo!
 
This has been a fantastic effort by SWAN groups across the country. Well done!
 
See you Saturday.